header-logo header-logo

12 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way , Costs , Employment , Legal aid focus , Libel
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Money, money, debt interest on costs

Legal aid is hard to get, but the numbers applying for exceptional funding are still low. In this week’s ‘Civil way’, NLJ columnist and former district judge Stephen Gold urges lawyers to apply

He writes: ‘Figures just out for the first quarter of this year show that there were only 910 exceptional funding applications. Of those determined, 77% were granted… Get those application numbers up, folks. Particularly in family.’

Gold covers an array of other topics, including the impact of silence in the face of an offer to mediate, some useful nuggets from the fire and rehire code of practice, and judicial input on the point from which an order for costs attracts judgment debt interest (amounting to several hundred thousand pounds in this instance).

Gold rounds up with a cautionary tale on malicious falsehood.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll