header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Politics, football & the BBC

07 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Procedure & practice , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
117930
Talk about an own goal—the BBC’s grounding of Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker over his tweets put the institution’s own impartiality under the spotlight.

Lineker’s resoluteness under pressure captured the public imagination and cast an unflattering light on the senior management of the BBC. In this week’s NLJ, John Gould, senior partner at Russell-Cooke, looks in depth at the issues involved, in particular the BBC’s duties of impartiality. How is it defined? What does it mean? What core values are involved? Is ‘impartiality’ the right conceptual approach anyway?

Gould writes: ‘As far as I know, Lineker has not yet been asked to anchor Newsnight, and it seems to follow that Lineker’s work only requires him to maintain impartiality in relation to football. There seems to be no problem with current affairs journalists being partial about sport.’ 

Read more on the headline case here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll