header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Probate—how creative practitioners can avoid it

117260
The process of obtaining probate can be a headache and a cause for despair, but what if there were an alternative? 

Ann Stanyer, partner at Wedlake Bell, writing in this week’s NLJ, suggests it may be ‘time to rethink’ whether a grant of representation is necessary and whether, instead, clients’ affairs could be structured in a way to avoid the probate process.

Stanyer sets out alternatives—for example, most high street banks are prepared to release up to £50,000 or more in some circumstances, without a grant of representation. She also looks at trusts and transfers of estate for high net worth individuals.

Stanyer concludes that while, the need for the grant will continue for complex estates, ‘practitioners need to be more creative in advising clients about how to avoid the need for a grant of representation for a straightforward estate’. 

Read more about the alternative options here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll