header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Research reveals flaws underlying government’s action plan on rape

24 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
112064
In this week’s NLJ, Michael Zander KC reports on research out this week that reveals the government’s plan to tackle low conviction rates in rape cases has been based on a fundamentally flawed premise.

The study, by Professor Cheryl Thomas, director of the Jury Project at University College London, reaches conclusions that contradict the basis of the government’s 2021 ‘End-to-end rape review report’, namely the reasons for an unprecedented drop in charging levels for rape since 2016. In fact, Professor Zander writes, ‘the precipitous fall in rape charging was part of a systemic fall in charging for all offences’.

Professor Zander highlights several assumptions about rape cases that could, potentially, be mistaken and backs Prof Thomas’s recommendation that in order for policies in this important area to be effective, they must be premised on actual facts and not perceptions. 

Read his full analysis here.

Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll