header-logo header-logo

12 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The rise of shareholder activism & the ‘shaky’ shareholder principle

152799
The basis of the shareholder principle is ‘shaky’, according to the recent High Court case of Various claimants v G4S

In this week’s NLJ, Lois Horne, disputes partner at Mcfarlanes and a London Solicitor Litigation Association (LSLA) Committee Member, takes a detailed look at the G4S judgment. She explains the practical importance of the principle, given the rise of shareholder activism and shareholder claims, and why there are doubts about its basis and scope.

The shareholder principle, as Horne explains, is ‘the principle that a company cannot assert privilege against its shareholders, except where the documents came into existence in contemplation of proceedings between the company and its shareholders’.

Horne notes the judge in G4S ‘was clearly struck by the absence of detailed consideration of the shareholder principle in previous cases’. However, some may also argue the principle is long-established. Horne highlights that practical difficulties may result and that the current rules are ‘problematic’.

Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll