header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: ‘Without prejudice’, assumption of responsibility & capacity

30 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Mental health , Expert Witness , Liability
printer mail-detail
220711
What protection is afforded to ‘without prejudice’ communications? This, and other conundrums are among the issues raised in recent personal injury caselaw. In this week’s NLJ, Vijay Ganapathy and Claire Spearpoint, both partners, Leigh Day, round up the latest important cases for practitioners

First up, assumption of responsibility is a much-debated area of tort. The authors discuss the difficult case of Dobson, where the court had to decide whether a police authority was liable for life-changing injuries sustained by a man who attempted suicide after release from custody. The man was brought in as he had threatened to kill himself, and the police arranged for a mental health assessment.

Ganapathy and Spearpoint cover assessment of capacity where the expert evidence was considered inadequate. Finally, they look at a case on the protective status of a ‘without prejudice’ letter in a motorcycle crash case where there were allegations of fundamental dishonesty—'a reminder that the without prejudice protection, while broad, is not absolute’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll