header-logo header-logo

No win no fee regulation

09 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment

The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) has announced plans to regulate “no-win-no-fee” agreements in employment tribunal cases.
Concerns have risen in recent years that clients are being exploited by unscrupulous lawyers who take huge slices out of their damages, fail to provide them with proper information, and lock them into unreasonable deals.

The MOJ proposes to introduce provisions in the Coroners and Justice Bill, currently before Parliament, that will cap the percentage of damages that can be recovered by the legal representative and require them to: provide clear and transparent information on total costs; clarify what deductions from the award will go towards their fee; and provide explicit information on alternative methods of funding.
 

Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll