header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Not so clever marketing?

225396
As the women’s Euros kicks off, Ian Blackshaw pitches in from the sidelines with some tips on how to tackle ambush marketing

Women’s football continues to increase in popularity among fans and sponsors around the world, and the 14th edition of the UEFA women’s tournament, currently underway in Switzerland, is no exception.

With such an important competition and considerable financial interest in it from sponsors and broadcasters, some forms of ‘ambush marketing’—a term that was coined in the 1980s by Jerry Walsh of American Express—are likely to rear their ugly heads.

Often referred to as ‘clever’ marketing, it is, in fact, a form of unfair competition in an economic or business sense. UEFA, which strictly prohibits ambush marketing, will aim to combat any instances of it, for the protection of the sponsors of the tournament.

A creative sport

Ambush marketing takes various forms according to the creativity of those who engage in this unfair marketing practice. These forms include using official event marks, logos or imagery without permission,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll