header-logo header-logo

16 May 2014
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Oil pollution

Assuranceforeningen Gard Gjensidig v The International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 [2014] EWHC 1394 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 74 (May)

The defendant (the Fund) was an international legal organisation, created pursuant to the Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution of 1971 (the Fund convention), and was a corporation under English law, by virtue of the International Organisations Act 1968 and the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (Immunities and Privileges) Order 1979 (the Order). The Fund enjoyed privileges and immunities within the UK, pursuant to Art 5 of the Headquarters Agreement with the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (the HQ Agreement) and s 6 of the Order. In proceedings brought by insurers who had had to pay for pollution in Venezuela, the insurers applied for a freezing injunction against the fund. 

It was held that the immunity conferred under s 6(1) of the order was not a complete immunity. It was a qualified immunity. Immunity was only granted if and to the extent that the suit or legal process did

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
back-to-top-scroll