header-logo header-logo

An Olympic risk

03 August 2012 / Robert Kay
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Robert Kay crunches the numbers involved in securing & insuring the London 2012 Olympic Games

With the London 2012 Olympic Games in full swing, it is worth remembering the myriad issues—and risks—the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has faced in insuring an event that is “the biggest security challenge this country has faced for decades”. A glance at the magnitude of the Games reveals some of the challenges.

London 2012 in numbers

Construction of the London Olympic Park required the demolition of more than 200 buildings, renewal of 1.4 million square metres of site, addition of 200 kilometres of electrical cables and construction of 30 bridges. In addition 4,000 trees, 74,000 plants, 60,000 bulbs and 350,000 wetland plants have been planted (and 2,000 newts relocated to a nature reserve).

In total, there are 50 sites, hosting 14,700 athletes from 205 countries competing across 26 sports in 34 venues. Moreover, roughly 500,000 spectators, 20,000 media and broadcasters, and a worldwide television audience of about five billion (with £5bn being the estimated advertising revenue) are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll