header-logo header-logo

An Olympic risk

03 August 2012 / Robert Kay
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Robert Kay crunches the numbers involved in securing & insuring the London 2012 Olympic Games

With the London 2012 Olympic Games in full swing, it is worth remembering the myriad issues—and risks—the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has faced in insuring an event that is “the biggest security challenge this country has faced for decades”. A glance at the magnitude of the Games reveals some of the challenges.

London 2012 in numbers

Construction of the London Olympic Park required the demolition of more than 200 buildings, renewal of 1.4 million square metres of site, addition of 200 kilometres of electrical cables and construction of 30 bridges. In addition 4,000 trees, 74,000 plants, 60,000 bulbs and 350,000 wetland plants have been planted (and 2,000 newts relocated to a nature reserve).

In total, there are 50 sites, hosting 14,700 athletes from 205 countries competing across 26 sports in 34 venues. Moreover, roughly 500,000 spectators, 20,000 media and broadcasters, and a worldwide television audience of about five billion (with £5bn being the estimated advertising revenue) are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll