header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Robert Kay
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

An Olympic risk

Robert Kay crunches the numbers involved in securing & insuring the London 2012 Olympic Games

With the London 2012 Olympic Games in full swing, it is worth remembering the myriad issues—and risks—the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has faced in insuring an event that is “the biggest security challenge this country has faced for decades”. A glance at the magnitude of the Games reveals some of the challenges.

London 2012 in numbers

Construction of the London Olympic Park required the demolition of more than 200 buildings, renewal of 1.4 million square metres of site, addition of 200 kilometres of electrical cables and construction of 30 bridges. In addition 4,000 trees, 74,000 plants, 60,000 bulbs and 350,000 wetland plants have been planted (and 2,000 newts relocated to a nature reserve).

In total, there are 50 sites, hosting 14,700 athletes from 205 countries competing across 26 sports in 34 venues. Moreover, roughly 500,000 spectators, 20,000 media and broadcasters, and a worldwide television audience of about five billion (with £5bn being the estimated advertising revenue) are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll