header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

One piece of the jigsaw

Chris Syder discusses the Modern Slavery Act

  • First UK company has been held liable for modern slavery offences.
  • There is increasing national and international collaboration on prosecuting modern slavery offences.
  • Businesses cannot afford to be complacent in reviewing their modern slavery risks.

The UK’s Modern Slavery Act 2015 (The Act) is ground breaking. It enables shareholders and the public to scrutinise and hold businesses better to account for what they are (or are not) doing to counter modern slavery in their business dealings. The Act also contains stronger criminal sanctions against those who illegally profit from such human rights exploitation: a strong incentive, if one was needed, to encourage business to operate in a socially responsible manner.

But theory is one thing, and practice often another. How are businesses fulfilling their new obligations under the Act, and how seriously should they take the threat of prosecution?

Reporting requirements

The Act is far reaching.

Any:

  • UK or foreign companies and other commercial organisations (including partnerships and LLPs
  • that carry out any business involving
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll