header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Online justice: the view from the House of Lords

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Michael Zander charts the progress of the government’s ambitious plans for conducting justice on line

In July 2016 Lord Justice Briggs (as he then was) published his Civil Courts Structural Review. One of the main recommendations was the establishment of an online court to deal with money claims of sums up to £25,000. The proposal was widely welcomed and in February 2017 the government moved to implement it in the Prisons and Courts Bill. But the Bill fell because of the June 2017 General Election. Now it is up and running again in the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill which had its 2nd Reading in the House of Lords on 14 May.

Whereas the original concept was limited to low level money claims, the new Bill is much more ambitious. Its provisions will apply to ‘specified kinds of proceedings’ defined in clause 2 as whatever kind of civil proceedings, family proceedings or proceedings in the First-tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal, employment tribunals and the Employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll