header-logo header-logo

Online justice: the view from the House of Lords

29 May 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Michael Zander charts the progress of the government’s ambitious plans for conducting justice on line

In July 2016 Lord Justice Briggs (as he then was) published his Civil Courts Structural Review. One of the main recommendations was the establishment of an online court to deal with money claims of sums up to £25,000. The proposal was widely welcomed and in February 2017 the government moved to implement it in the Prisons and Courts Bill. But the Bill fell because of the June 2017 General Election. Now it is up and running again in the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill which had its 2nd Reading in the House of Lords on 14 May.

Whereas the original concept was limited to low level money claims, the new Bill is much more ambitious. Its provisions will apply to ‘specified kinds of proceedings’ defined in clause 2 as whatever kind of civil proceedings, family proceedings or proceedings in the First-tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal, employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll