header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Online justice: the view from the House of Lords

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Michael Zander charts the progress of the government’s ambitious plans for conducting justice on line

In July 2016 Lord Justice Briggs (as he then was) published his Civil Courts Structural Review. One of the main recommendations was the establishment of an online court to deal with money claims of sums up to £25,000. The proposal was widely welcomed and in February 2017 the government moved to implement it in the Prisons and Courts Bill. But the Bill fell because of the June 2017 General Election. Now it is up and running again in the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill which had its 2nd Reading in the House of Lords on 14 May.

Whereas the original concept was limited to low level money claims, the new Bill is much more ambitious. Its provisions will apply to ‘specified kinds of proceedings’ defined in clause 2 as whatever kind of civil proceedings, family proceedings or proceedings in the First-tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal, employment tribunals and the Employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll