header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Open to all-comers?

web_bindman_1

Geoffrey Bindman QC considers the moral minefield of picking & choosing clients

Some years ago I was asked to take on an interesting case. A general election was approaching. A political party had been refused the hire of a town hall for an election meeting and wanted to challenge the refusal. Election law interested me and I had some experience. I turned down the invitation. The client was the British National Party.

 

The correct path?

Was I right to do so? My emotional reaction was revulsion at helping those with abhorrent views and aims. I rationalised it by claiming that my feelings would make it impossible to do an adequate job.

I would not have the same objection to representing those accused of and quite possibly guilty of the most appalling crimes. And I have always firmly resisted the glib assumption that a lawyer must share the political views of his or her client—a slur often addressed to those on the political left, but rarely to those on the right.

When

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll