header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Open to all-comers?

web_bindman_1

Geoffrey Bindman QC considers the moral minefield of picking & choosing clients

Some years ago I was asked to take on an interesting case. A general election was approaching. A political party had been refused the hire of a town hall for an election meeting and wanted to challenge the refusal. Election law interested me and I had some experience. I turned down the invitation. The client was the British National Party.

 

The correct path?

Was I right to do so? My emotional reaction was revulsion at helping those with abhorrent views and aims. I rationalised it by claiming that my feelings would make it impossible to do an adequate job.

I would not have the same objection to representing those accused of and quite possibly guilty of the most appalling crimes. And I have always firmly resisted the glib assumption that a lawyer must share the political views of his or her client—a slur often addressed to those on the political left, but rarely to those on the right.

When

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll