header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

Out of pocket

Roderick Ramage describes a radical shift in the law on bankruptcy

When an individual becomes bankrupt, his estate automatically vests in his trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) under s 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).

Where the bankruptcy order was made before 29 May 2000, it was established in Re Landau [1997] 3 All ER 322 that the TIB was entitled to claim the entire pension benefits of the scheme member, not just pensions in payment. All the member’s rights under the policy excluding protected rights (ie rights where contracted out of the state second pension) vested in the TIB and continued to be vested in him even after the bankrupt was himself discharged, enabling the TIB to claim entitlement to them until all debts were discharged.

In an effort to protect their members, many pension schemes introduced clauses to forfeit a member’s entitlement to benefits automatically upon bankruptcy and to bring into operation protective trusts, under which the trustees had a discretion to make payments up to the value of those benefits

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll