header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

Out of pocket

Roderick Ramage describes a radical shift in the law on bankruptcy

When an individual becomes bankrupt, his estate automatically vests in his trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) under s 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).

Where the bankruptcy order was made before 29 May 2000, it was established in Re Landau [1997] 3 All ER 322 that the TIB was entitled to claim the entire pension benefits of the scheme member, not just pensions in payment. All the member’s rights under the policy excluding protected rights (ie rights where contracted out of the state second pension) vested in the TIB and continued to be vested in him even after the bankrupt was himself discharged, enabling the TIB to claim entitlement to them until all debts were discharged.

In an effort to protect their members, many pension schemes introduced clauses to forfeit a member’s entitlement to benefits automatically upon bankruptcy and to bring into operation protective trusts, under which the trustees had a discretion to make payments up to the value of those benefits

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll