header-logo header-logo

Paying the price

14 February 2014 / Helen Mulcahy , Davina Bentley
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_mulcahy_bentley

What is the liability of a director who pays debts while his company is insolvent? Helen Mulcahy & Davina Bentley report

Recently, the liquidators of HLC Environmental Projects Limited (HLC) issued a claim for misfeasance against the principal director of HLC, Mr Carvalho, pursuant to s 212 Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). The liquidators claimed that Carvalho acted in breach of his duties as a director, both under common law and pursuant to ss 171(b) and 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) in relation to payments he caused HLC to make while it was insolvent.

 

Background

HLC carried on business in the waste recycling sector. In 1998, HLC became the preferred bidder to build recycling and energy centres in the UK. Two related companies, HLC Wrexham and HLC NPT, were set up and HLC was the holding company. By September 2005, administrators were appointed to HLC NPT and the HLC Wrexham project could not be completed.

Carvalho claimed that in 2008, HLC was still trading but the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll