header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Helen Mulcahy , Davina Bentley
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paying the price

web_mulcahy_bentley

What is the liability of a director who pays debts while his company is insolvent? Helen Mulcahy & Davina Bentley report

Recently, the liquidators of HLC Environmental Projects Limited (HLC) issued a claim for misfeasance against the principal director of HLC, Mr Carvalho, pursuant to s 212 Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). The liquidators claimed that Carvalho acted in breach of his duties as a director, both under common law and pursuant to ss 171(b) and 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) in relation to payments he caused HLC to make while it was insolvent.

 

Background

HLC carried on business in the waste recycling sector. In 1998, HLC became the preferred bidder to build recycling and energy centres in the UK. Two related companies, HLC Wrexham and HLC NPT, were set up and HLC was the holding company. By September 2005, administrators were appointed to HLC NPT and the HLC Wrexham project could not be completed.

Carvalho claimed that in 2008, HLC was still trading but the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll