header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

PI premiums predicted to rise

Indemnity premiums escalate as firms told to expect an upturn in claims

Professional indemnity premiums are rising, amid a growing number of “potential claims” against law firms.

The Law Society last week launched a package of advice and free seminars on renewing indemnity cover in response to insurers’ pressure to raise premiums. The package includes a series of free seminars and one-to-one consultations with a broker, and a practice note.

Frank Maher, partner, Legal Risk, says the advice was helpful in that it “emphasises the need for firms to get on with it”.

“The Law Society guidance recommends that firms start thinking about insurance in May, and sending out proposal forms in June. I think that’s sound.

“It’s good in that it emphasises the need for risk management. It mentions Lexcel as a tool to help in that aim. The problem is that people sometimes see Lexcel as the start and finish, when it is really the beginning of the journey,” he says.

Solicitors have to renew their insurance on 1 October. However, many solicitors want the single renewal date to be abolished.

Maher says: “The Law Society has in the past looked at this as an issue that relates only to the cost of insurance and the need to make sure firms have got it in place.

“Cost is no longer the only issue for law firms. Last September, there was concern over AIG. What if a major insurer was to fold in the weeks leading up to the renewal date? There is a risk management issue there.

“The vast majority of firms want a flexible renewal date. We are the only profession in this country that has a fixed renewal date.”

He adds: “We are seeing a large number of potential claims in relation to conveyancing. We are not seeing the claims coming through yet but that may be because the lenders haven’t been able to sell the properties. Once we see an upturn in the property market, there may also be an upturn in claims.”

Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll