header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Plugging the leaks

Charles Pigott tracks the government’s moves to close whistleblowing “loopholes”

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill will make significant changes to the protection for workers who blow the whistle. Originally planned for this month, these are now likely to be implemented in the summer, once the Bill receives royal assent.

Addressing Parkins v Sodhexo

Back in 2011, when announcing the coalition’s plans on the employment law front, Vince Cable said: “Finally, we want to close a loophole in the Public Interest Disclosure Act relating to whistleblowing. It has become apparent through case law that employees are able to blow the whistle about breaches to their own personal work contract. This is not what the legislation is designed to achieve and we are going to stop this in future.”

In order to qualify for protection a disclosure must fall within one of six categories set out in s 43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996). Cable was referring to the second category, which applies when the information disclosed tends to show “that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll