header-logo header-logo

08 March 2013 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Power to the people?

web_davies_1

Keith Davies analyses a recent judicial review of plans to erect electricity pylons on green belt land

Everybody (save a few hermits) loves electricity; nobody (save a few enthusiasts) loves pylons. But can we have the electricity without the pylons?

To judge from our landscape, and not only in the UK, but the whole world, the answer is a resounding: No. But the 21st century, even more than the 20th, is the age of David and Goliath; of “nimby” v “vandal”; an era when people who tolerate electricity pylons in other people’s backyards are not prepared to tolerate such things in their own. Electricity yes; pylons no; underground cables maybe (if you can keep the cost to a minimum).

Even pylons and overhead cables eventually become familiar, and what is the point of fighting the familiar? Between the two world wars in the UK, the National Grid was created, to plan and build a national network of cables and pylons, marching stage by stage through towns, suburbs, farmland and moorland. But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll