header-logo header-logo

08 March 2013 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Power to the people?

web_davies_1

Keith Davies analyses a recent judicial review of plans to erect electricity pylons on green belt land

Everybody (save a few hermits) loves electricity; nobody (save a few enthusiasts) loves pylons. But can we have the electricity without the pylons?

To judge from our landscape, and not only in the UK, but the whole world, the answer is a resounding: No. But the 21st century, even more than the 20th, is the age of David and Goliath; of “nimby” v “vandal”; an era when people who tolerate electricity pylons in other people’s backyards are not prepared to tolerate such things in their own. Electricity yes; pylons no; underground cables maybe (if you can keep the cost to a minimum).

Even pylons and overhead cables eventually become familiar, and what is the point of fighting the familiar? Between the two world wars in the UK, the National Grid was created, to plan and build a national network of cables and pylons, marching stage by stage through towns, suburbs, farmland and moorland. But

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll