header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

QC selection working

Profession

Duncan Nichol has rejected the consideration of “additional forms of excellence” in his report into the selection procedure for Queen’s Counsel appointments, published last week.

He had been asked to consider whether “additional forms of excellence such as both litigation and nonlitigation work for partners in law firms, or wholly advisory work by lawyers in non-judicial fora, or the work of general counsel should and could be recognised by the same award of silk”.

However, Sir Duncan advised against this, stating: “It is not the right time to reignite the debate that was resolved between the Bar Council and the Law Society and approved by the lord chancellor as recently as three years ago.

“The new process is still relatively immature and vulnerable. It is also capable of being refined and approved within its current purpose and to that end the review has made a number of recommendations.”

Overall, he found the system worked well, and recommended the promotion of the QC honoris causa award to practising lawyers for a wide range of achievements.

Professor Dame Joan Higgins has been appointed as the new lay chairman of the QC Selection Panel, replacing Baroness Butler-Sloss.

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll