header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

QC selection working

Profession

Duncan Nichol has rejected the consideration of “additional forms of excellence” in his report into the selection procedure for Queen’s Counsel appointments, published last week.

He had been asked to consider whether “additional forms of excellence such as both litigation and nonlitigation work for partners in law firms, or wholly advisory work by lawyers in non-judicial fora, or the work of general counsel should and could be recognised by the same award of silk”.

However, Sir Duncan advised against this, stating: “It is not the right time to reignite the debate that was resolved between the Bar Council and the Law Society and approved by the lord chancellor as recently as three years ago.

“The new process is still relatively immature and vulnerable. It is also capable of being refined and approved within its current purpose and to that end the review has made a number of recommendations.”

Overall, he found the system worked well, and recommended the promotion of the QC honoris causa award to practising lawyers for a wide range of achievements.

Professor Dame Joan Higgins has been appointed as the new lay chairman of the QC Selection Panel, replacing Baroness Butler-Sloss.

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll