header-logo header-logo

Re-grouping redress

226386
Michael Brown & Harriet Campbell consider the future form for class actions in the UK
  • Recent court decisions have guided claimants on the best way to bring group claims.
  • In group litigation, it is crucial to understand the nuances of the different procedural methods. Finding flexibility is key. While representative claims offer greater economic efficiencies, they carry a significant risk.

Recent decisions from the English courts have given guidance to claimants on the best way to bring group claims. In particular, key decisions on claims brought in an ‘omnibus’ claim form, under a group litigation order and as a representative action may have effectively shaped the future parameters of group litigation in this jurisdiction. This article looks at the court’s approach and the guidance that can be gleaned from recent case law. In light of the Civil Justice Council’s (CJC’s) recent final report on litigation funding, we also consider the potential impact of the proposed simplification of the conditional fee and litigation funding regulatory regimes.

The group claim framework

Outside

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll