header-logo header-logo

Re-grouping redress

226386
Michael Brown & Harriet Campbell consider the future form for class actions in the UK
  • Recent court decisions have guided claimants on the best way to bring group claims.
  • In group litigation, it is crucial to understand the nuances of the different procedural methods. Finding flexibility is key. While representative claims offer greater economic efficiencies, they carry a significant risk.

Recent decisions from the English courts have given guidance to claimants on the best way to bring group claims. In particular, key decisions on claims brought in an ‘omnibus’ claim form, under a group litigation order and as a representative action may have effectively shaped the future parameters of group litigation in this jurisdiction. This article looks at the court’s approach and the guidance that can be gleaned from recent case law. In light of the Civil Justice Council’s (CJC’s) recent final report on litigation funding, we also consider the potential impact of the proposed simplification of the conditional fee and litigation funding regulatory regimes.

The group claim framework

Outside

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll