header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / James Naylor , Claire Southway
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Rebuild & renewal

James Naylor & Claire Southway explain why Risegold is good news for developers

 

The Court of Appeal has recently provided much food for thought in the case of Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1180, Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 269 (Oct). It concerned neighbouring freehold premises at Quaker Court, London E1, consisting of warehouse/industrial units, and the extent of an easement granted to the owner of one of those premises, giving it the right to enter into part of the adjoining premises.
In 1993, both Risegold and Escala’s premises were in joint ownership. Title in units 5 and 6 was transferred to Risegold’s predecessors in title on 28 July 1993, and the title in units 3 and 4 to Escala on 6 August 1993.
The grant (or reservation) of the benefit to Risegold was in all material respects identical in both transfers and was in the following terms: “The right (exercisable upon prior notice of not less than forty eight hours given
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll