header-logo header-logo

Redundancy law in practice

03 December 2021 / John McMullen
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
66012
John McMullen discusses some recent decisions in the courts on compulsory redundancy in the wake of COVID-19
  • The selection pool & suitable alternative employment.
  • Redundancy procedures and trust and confidence.
  • Disappearing need for employees, though the job is still there.
  • Collective redundancies and information and consultation.

There are many reasons why employers may take the difficult decision to make redundancies, ranging from the impossible to predict 2020/21 COVID-19 global pandemic to the inherent economic cycle or technological evolution.

Redundancy has a profound effect on employee security, both those who may lose their employment and those who stay. As disruptive as it may be for the displaced individual, the opportunity arises for the employer to restructure in a way that can actually turn a negative into a positive and allow it to prosper in the future.

Advice should be given on the counselling or outplacement of employees to be made redundant and the support to be given to the envoys of the redundancy message, as well as motivating those members

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll