header-logo header-logo

03 December 2021 / John McMullen
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Redundancy law in practice

66012
John McMullen discusses some recent decisions in the courts on compulsory redundancy in the wake of COVID-19
  • The selection pool & suitable alternative employment.
  • Redundancy procedures and trust and confidence.
  • Disappearing need for employees, though the job is still there.
  • Collective redundancies and information and consultation.

There are many reasons why employers may take the difficult decision to make redundancies, ranging from the impossible to predict 2020/21 COVID-19 global pandemic to the inherent economic cycle or technological evolution.

Redundancy has a profound effect on employee security, both those who may lose their employment and those who stay. As disruptive as it may be for the displaced individual, the opportunity arises for the employer to restructure in a way that can actually turn a negative into a positive and allow it to prosper in the future.

Advice should be given on the counselling or outplacement of employees to be made redundant and the support to be given to the envoys of the redundancy message, as well as motivating those members

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll