header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The reform carousel

new_image_30_4

Stephen Levinson assesses the government’s tribunal bandwagon

Those familiar with some history may be forgiven for thinking that the government’s recent consultation paper, Resolving Workplace Disputes, was written by amnesiacs. For an institution less than 50 years old employment tribunals have been much reviewed.

There was Justice in 1987; the green paper, Options for Reform in 1994; Fairness at Work in 1998; the Leggatt Report in 2001 and, in 2002, the very thorough report of the Employment Tribunal System Taskforce (ETST). There was a white paper in 2004, and in 2007 the Ministry of Justice chipped in with Transforming Tribunals. Then again in 2010 the secretive Tribunal Steering Board came up with a Report on Consistency. What is notable about the current offering is that although many of the 13 ideas proposed have appeared before in one or more of those reports no acknowledgement of this appears anywhere.

Alarmingly the only mention to previous work on tribunals is to the Gibbons Review of 2007—a piece of matchless political expediency—which told the world what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll