header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The reform carousel

new_image_30_4

Stephen Levinson assesses the government’s tribunal bandwagon

Those familiar with some history may be forgiven for thinking that the government’s recent consultation paper, Resolving Workplace Disputes, was written by amnesiacs. For an institution less than 50 years old employment tribunals have been much reviewed.

There was Justice in 1987; the green paper, Options for Reform in 1994; Fairness at Work in 1998; the Leggatt Report in 2001 and, in 2002, the very thorough report of the Employment Tribunal System Taskforce (ETST). There was a white paper in 2004, and in 2007 the Ministry of Justice chipped in with Transforming Tribunals. Then again in 2010 the secretive Tribunal Steering Board came up with a Report on Consistency. What is notable about the current offering is that although many of the 13 ideas proposed have appeared before in one or more of those reports no acknowledgement of this appears anywhere.

Alarmingly the only mention to previous work on tribunals is to the Gibbons Review of 2007—a piece of matchless political expediency—which told the world what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll