header-logo header-logo

Reform likely for guideline hourly rates

19 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
Costs lawyers have called for the guideline hourly rates (GHR) to revert to the old system of being set locally

Costs lawyers have called for the guideline hourly rates (GHR) to revert to the old system of being set locally

It emerged last week that a sub-committee of the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has been established to review the rates, with the agreement of the Master of the Rolls. The sub-committee will report directly to Lord Justice Coulson, deputy head of civil justice, and will ‘make recommendations by the end of the year, so that the rates can be updated,’ according to the recently published minutes of March’s Civil Procedure Rule Committee meeting.

The GHR, which help judges assess costs, have not changed since 2010 despite costs rising. The issue came to the fore last year after Mrs Justice O’Farrell said the current levels were ‘not helpful’ when deciding what reasonable rates should be in 2019, in Ohpen Operations UK Ltd v Invesco Fund Managers Ltd [2019] EWHC 2504 (TCC). In the wake of that judgment, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) surveyed its members―60% said a review was urgent, agreeing that the current GHR were doing more harm than good.

ACL chair Claire Green says: ‘It is pleasing that the Master of the Rolls and the sub-committee have recognised the urgency of reviewing the GHR. Especially given the current Covid-19 crisis, it is more important than ever that lawyers are paid a proper, economic rate for their work that reflects the costs they have to carry.

'It goes without saying that this is a very difficult time with many competing priorities, but cash flow is particularly vital for many firms at the moment. A change in the GHR―not gratuitous, but still based on evidence―would be widely welcomed.'

Last December, the rule committee’s costs sub-committee recommended a different approach to collecting the evidence, noting that Lord Justice Jackson recommended a less rigorous examination of market rates, in his final report on costs in 2010. It suggested producing ‘broad approximations’ or reverting to the previous system of letting judges set rates locally after discussions with local solicitors.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll