header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Regan on Jackson: some predictions on fixed costs

Lord Justice Jackson will set the ceiling for fixed recoverable costs ‘at a considerably lower level’ than first proposed, Dominic Regan, professor of law at City University, has predicted.

Jackson LJ proposed an extension of fixed costs to claims worth up to £250,000, in January 2016. However, he has since been conducting roadshows with interested parties around the countries as part of his consultation. He is due to submit his report by the end of July.

Writing in NLJ this week, Regan said: ‘A figure of or about £100,000 has been widely mentioned. Do appreciate that where fixed costs do not apply costs management will. The growing acceptance of budgeting has indeed persuaded Lord Justice Jackson to relent from his original proposal.’

Regan said another possibility is that the report could recommend the creation of a new litigation track for cases within the fixed costs regime, specifying standard directions to rein in costs on disclosure, witnesses and experts. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll