header-logo header-logo

Regan on Jackson: some predictions on fixed costs

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Lord Justice Jackson will set the ceiling for fixed recoverable costs ‘at a considerably lower level’ than first proposed, Dominic Regan, professor of law at City University, has predicted.

Jackson LJ proposed an extension of fixed costs to claims worth up to £250,000, in January 2016. However, he has since been conducting roadshows with interested parties around the countries as part of his consultation. He is due to submit his report by the end of July.

Writing in NLJ this week, Regan said: ‘A figure of or about £100,000 has been widely mentioned. Do appreciate that where fixed costs do not apply costs management will. The growing acceptance of budgeting has indeed persuaded Lord Justice Jackson to relent from his original proposal.’

Regan said another possibility is that the report could recommend the creation of a new litigation track for cases within the fixed costs regime, specifying standard directions to rein in costs on disclosure, witnesses and experts. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll