header-logo header-logo

Relative values

31 May 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Family
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham provides a round-up of recent adoption & intestacy cases

Child adoption has had legal status in England and Wales since 1926. But only now—in the wake of a 2010 intestacy, a £3.2m trust settlement from 1948 and the European Convention on Human Rights—are adoptees recognised as “statutory next of kin”.

Sons win

The trust’s sole beneficiary, the settlor’s daughter, died in 2010, leaving no children or other descendants. But her late sister, the next entitled, did leave two sons, Christopher and Stephen Pigott, whom she had adopted 60 years ago.

The first question to be decided in Re Erskine Trust, Gregg and anor v Pigott and ors [2012] EWHC 732 (Ch) was the meaning of “statutory next of kin”—“the persons who would take beneficially on an intestacy” under s 50(1) of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925). The second was whether the Convention, which became part of English law in 2000, had retrospective effect on AEA 1925 and on the construction of a private settlement made in 1948.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll