header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 October 2009 / William Childs , Ian Sadler
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence , Employment
printer mail-detail

Representation matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ian Sadler & William Childs examine the right to legal representation at disciplinary proceedings

The decision in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2009] EWCA CIV 789, [2009] All ER (D) 248 (Jul) represented a significant development in the law relating to doctors and dentists facing disciplinary proceedings within the NHS. However, practitioners will also be interested in its application in cases involving all employees of public bodies or near monopoly employers faced with potentially career threatening disciplinary action.

Dr Kulkarni was a junior doctor facing potentially serious allegations of professional misconduct in the course of his medical practice while employed by the respondent NHS trust.

Through the Medical Protection Society, his medical defence organisation, he sought to bring a legal representative to the proposed disciplinary hearing. The trust refused his application, relying upon an express term of its contractual disciplinary procedure excluding the right to legal representation.

The disciplinary procedures

In 2005 new pan-NHS disciplinary procedures were introduced. Before this time, doctors and dentists enjoyed the express contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll