header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 October 2009 / William Childs , Ian Sadler
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence , Employment
printer mail-detail

Representation matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ian Sadler & William Childs examine the right to legal representation at disciplinary proceedings

The decision in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2009] EWCA CIV 789, [2009] All ER (D) 248 (Jul) represented a significant development in the law relating to doctors and dentists facing disciplinary proceedings within the NHS. However, practitioners will also be interested in its application in cases involving all employees of public bodies or near monopoly employers faced with potentially career threatening disciplinary action.

Dr Kulkarni was a junior doctor facing potentially serious allegations of professional misconduct in the course of his medical practice while employed by the respondent NHS trust.

Through the Medical Protection Society, his medical defence organisation, he sought to bring a legal representative to the proposed disciplinary hearing. The trust refused his application, relying upon an express term of its contractual disciplinary procedure excluding the right to legal representation.

The disciplinary procedures

In 2005 new pan-NHS disciplinary procedures were introduced. Before this time, doctors and dentists enjoyed the express contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll