header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Representation matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
01 October 2009 / William Childs , Ian Sadler
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Sadler & William Childs examine the right to legal representation at disciplinary proceedings

The decision in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2009] EWCA CIV 789, [2009] All ER (D) 248 (Jul) represented a significant development in the law relating to doctors and dentists facing disciplinary proceedings within the NHS. However, practitioners will also be interested in its application in cases involving all employees of public bodies or near monopoly employers faced with potentially career threatening disciplinary action.

Dr Kulkarni was a junior doctor facing potentially serious allegations of professional misconduct in the course of his medical practice while employed by the respondent NHS trust.

Through the Medical Protection Society, his medical defence organisation, he sought to bring a legal representative to the proposed disciplinary hearing. The trust refused his application, relying upon an express term of its contractual disciplinary procedure excluding the right to legal representation.

The disciplinary procedures

In 2005 new pan-NHS disciplinary procedures were introduced. Before this time, doctors and dentists enjoyed the express contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor finance faces £11bn reckoning
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll