header-logo header-logo

Resolution—Juliet Harvey

02 July 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
First-ever legal executive appointed chair of national family justice body
Resolution has announced that it has appointed a new national chair in Juliet Harvey who took up the position on 24 June at the conclusion of its AGM.


Juliet becomes the first legal executive to lead the 6,500+ member body after serving as vice-chair for the past two years. Her elevation to chair was delayed by three months after the postponement of the AGM, originally due in March, as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

The previous chair, Margaret Heathcote, continued in position in order to co-ordinate Resolution’s response to the crisis.

On assuming the position of national chair, Juliet Harvey said: ‘I am delighted to take up the role and excited to see what we can achieve together. However, it is a responsibility that I do not bear lightly. I will work tirelessly to ensure Resolution continues to serve all members throughout these unprecedented times. The recovery period will not be without its challenges, but Resolution is ideally-placed to support family practitioners to meet these challenges. My message to our members, and anyone thinking of joining, is “Resolution is here for you”.

‘I would like to pay tribute to my predecessor Margaret Heathcote. Her unfaltering energy, commitment, and sense of humour has resulted in Resolution being in an even stronger position than it was two years ago. I know I speak on behalf of our entire membership when I say a heartfelt thank you to Margaret for her leadership, and in particular for staying on longer than planned to help us deal with the current crisis.

‘I am proud to serve as the first Legal Executive to become Chair of Resolution. I feel it is vital that we broaden our membership, recruiting more legal executives, barristers, financial advisors and others into our ranks. Resolution is an organisation for the entire family justice community, not just for solicitors.’

Previous chair Margaret Heathcote welcomed her successor adding: ‘I wish Juliet the very best of luck in the role. She no doubt takes up the position in unprecedented and challenging circumstances but I am sure her strong and thoughtful leadership will see Resolution continue to thrive. It has been a privilege and honour to serve our members over the past two years as chair and I feel enormously proud of what we’ve achieved together.’

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll