header-logo header-logo

Resolution—Juliet Harvey

02 July 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
First-ever legal executive appointed chair of national family justice body
Resolution has announced that it has appointed a new national chair in Juliet Harvey who took up the position on 24 June at the conclusion of its AGM.


Juliet becomes the first legal executive to lead the 6,500+ member body after serving as vice-chair for the past two years. Her elevation to chair was delayed by three months after the postponement of the AGM, originally due in March, as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

The previous chair, Margaret Heathcote, continued in position in order to co-ordinate Resolution’s response to the crisis.

On assuming the position of national chair, Juliet Harvey said: ‘I am delighted to take up the role and excited to see what we can achieve together. However, it is a responsibility that I do not bear lightly. I will work tirelessly to ensure Resolution continues to serve all members throughout these unprecedented times. The recovery period will not be without its challenges, but Resolution is ideally-placed to support family practitioners to meet these challenges. My message to our members, and anyone thinking of joining, is “Resolution is here for you”.

‘I would like to pay tribute to my predecessor Margaret Heathcote. Her unfaltering energy, commitment, and sense of humour has resulted in Resolution being in an even stronger position than it was two years ago. I know I speak on behalf of our entire membership when I say a heartfelt thank you to Margaret for her leadership, and in particular for staying on longer than planned to help us deal with the current crisis.

‘I am proud to serve as the first Legal Executive to become Chair of Resolution. I feel it is vital that we broaden our membership, recruiting more legal executives, barristers, financial advisors and others into our ranks. Resolution is an organisation for the entire family justice community, not just for solicitors.’

Previous chair Margaret Heathcote welcomed her successor adding: ‘I wish Juliet the very best of luck in the role. She no doubt takes up the position in unprecedented and challenging circumstances but I am sure her strong and thoughtful leadership will see Resolution continue to thrive. It has been a privilege and honour to serve our members over the past two years as chair and I feel enormously proud of what we’ve achieved together.’

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll