header-logo header-logo

Retention of EU law: how much?

11 August 2017 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
03_tayleur

Trevor Tayleur discusses some significant exclusions from the scope of retained EU law post-Brexit

  • The Repeal Bill will convert much of existing EU law into domestic UK as ‘retained EU law’.
  • However, there are some significant exclusions from the scope of retained EU law. These could have a significant effect on the ability of individuals to enforce their existing EU rights post-exit.

Retained EU law will become an important concept for UK lawyers when the UK leaves the EU. In order to preserve a functioning UK statute book upon the UK’s exit, the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill) will convert swathes of EU law as it exists on the date of exit into domestic UK law. The Repeal Bill labels all such law as ‘retained EU law’. Retained EU law will be a body of law with its own distinct characteristics, so it is important to know what it will encompass. According to the Repeal Bill, its main elements will be:

EU-derived domestic legislation

This will consist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll