header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Retention of EU law: how much?

03_tayleur

Trevor Tayleur discusses some significant exclusions from the scope of retained EU law post-Brexit

  • The Repeal Bill will convert much of existing EU law into domestic UK as ‘retained EU law’.
  • However, there are some significant exclusions from the scope of retained EU law. These could have a significant effect on the ability of individuals to enforce their existing EU rights post-exit.

Retained EU law will become an important concept for UK lawyers when the UK leaves the EU. In order to preserve a functioning UK statute book upon the UK’s exit, the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill) will convert swathes of EU law as it exists on the date of exit into domestic UK law. The Repeal Bill labels all such law as ‘retained EU law’. Retained EU law will be a body of law with its own distinct characteristics, so it is important to know what it will encompass. According to the Repeal Bill, its main elements will be:

EU-derived domestic legislation

This will consist chiefly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll