header-logo header-logo

Retention matters

12 May 2011 / James Farrell , Trevor Davies
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Features , Profession , Data protection
printer mail-detail

James Farrell & Trevor Davies put international document retention procedures under the spotlight

In most jurisdictions, document retention requirements are spread across a plethora of legislation, regulations and professional guidance notes, often relating to a specific sector—such as for the financial services industry, the energy sector or the telecommunications market. Fundamentally, document management policies have two key driving forces:

(i) the requirement to retain documents under various regulatory and legislative regimes; and

(ii) the requirement to delete or destroy certain data, usually personal data, within prescribed timeframes.

However, these requirements often differ dramatically between jurisdictions, with very little international standardisation—even among the member states of the EU. In response to the lack of guidance on the wide reaching areas of document management and retention, Herbert Smith and its Alliance partners Gleiss Lutz and Stibbe have recently launched a review of document retention practices in 22 jurisdictions (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, England and Wales, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, UAE and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll