header-logo header-logo

Retention matters

12 May 2011 / James Farrell , Trevor Davies
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Features , Profession , Data protection
printer mail-detail

James Farrell & Trevor Davies put international document retention procedures under the spotlight

In most jurisdictions, document retention requirements are spread across a plethora of legislation, regulations and professional guidance notes, often relating to a specific sector—such as for the financial services industry, the energy sector or the telecommunications market. Fundamentally, document management policies have two key driving forces:

(i) the requirement to retain documents under various regulatory and legislative regimes; and

(ii) the requirement to delete or destroy certain data, usually personal data, within prescribed timeframes.

However, these requirements often differ dramatically between jurisdictions, with very little international standardisation—even among the member states of the EU. In response to the lack of guidance on the wide reaching areas of document management and retention, Herbert Smith and its Alliance partners Gleiss Lutz and Stibbe have recently launched a review of document retention practices in 22 jurisdictions (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, England and Wales, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, UAE and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll