header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Return of the divorced

Recovering economy spurs rise in claims for more money

The number of divorced people returning to court to claim more money from their ex has more than doubled in the past year.

Some 29,060 people made a post-divorce financial claim in 2014, compared to 14,690 people in 2013, according to figures collected by law firm Hugh James.

The reason many ex-spouses return to court is that couples often fail to obtain a court order to formalise their financial agreement when they divorce, for example, where they reach their own informal settlement, according to Hugh James. Without this order, an ex can bring a new claim even years after their marriage was dissolved. Earlier this year, for example, the impoverished ex-wife of the multi-millionaire founder of Ecotricity brought a claim against him more than 20 years after they divorced, even though he was a penniless hippy living in a van during their marriage, in Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14.

During the recession, couples often preferred to make an informal division of assets in order to keep costs down. The number of claims brought outside the divorce process also dipped, to just 3,620 in 2011. Without a binding legal agreement, however, there is no time limit on one partner pursuing a further financial claim.

Meanwhile, the recovering economy has made such disputes more likely.

Charlotte Leyshon, associate at Hugh James, says: “The final step of having an agreement reached through mediation or arbitration formalised and adopted as a court order is crucial.

“Failure to do so leaves the door open to an unexpected future financial claim. Claims over pensions are a common reason for ex-spouses going back to court after a divorce. Since they are complex and not always relevant to immediate financial needs, they often don’t get the attention they should.”

 
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll