header-logo header-logo

Return of the divorced

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Recovering economy spurs rise in claims for more money

The number of divorced people returning to court to claim more money from their ex has more than doubled in the past year.

Some 29,060 people made a post-divorce financial claim in 2014, compared to 14,690 people in 2013, according to figures collected by law firm Hugh James.

The reason many ex-spouses return to court is that couples often fail to obtain a court order to formalise their financial agreement when they divorce, for example, where they reach their own informal settlement, according to Hugh James. Without this order, an ex can bring a new claim even years after their marriage was dissolved. Earlier this year, for example, the impoverished ex-wife of the multi-millionaire founder of Ecotricity brought a claim against him more than 20 years after they divorced, even though he was a penniless hippy living in a van during their marriage, in Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14.

During the recession, couples often preferred to make an informal division of assets in order to keep costs down. The number of claims brought outside the divorce process also dipped, to just 3,620 in 2011. Without a binding legal agreement, however, there is no time limit on one partner pursuing a further financial claim.

Meanwhile, the recovering economy has made such disputes more likely.

Charlotte Leyshon, associate at Hugh James, says: “The final step of having an agreement reached through mediation or arbitration formalised and adopted as a court order is crucial.

“Failure to do so leaves the door open to an unexpected future financial claim. Claims over pensions are a common reason for ex-spouses going back to court after a divorce. Since they are complex and not always relevant to immediate financial needs, they often don’t get the attention they should.”

 
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll