header-logo header-logo

Rights and wrongs

04 September 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A genuine and comprehensive Bill of Rights is a distant prospect, says Geoffrey Bindman

A Bill of Rights is a constitutional document setting out the rights which every citizen is entitled to expect its government to guarantee. Britain has had Bills of Rights in the past. Magna Carta is one example; and in 1688 Parliament drew up a Bill of Rights which limited and defined the power of the monarchy and established Parliamentary sovereignty. The value of a Bill of Rights is in its overriding authority and general acceptance but it need not be, and has not been in Britain, binding on Parliament. That is why we say we do not have a “written constitution”, unlike many other countries, including the USA, where legislation must conform to the constitution or be invalidated.

When the UK signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950—it was largely the brainchild of British lawyers—it could be claimed that it had adopted the convention as its Bill of Rights. However, even after 1966, when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll