header-logo header-logo

Rights under pressure

26 April 2012 / Susan Nash
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Susan Nash provides an update on the latest human rights controversies

Relying on Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Art 1 of Protocol No 1 (protection of property), the applicants in Kolyadenko v Russia (App Nos 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05), complained that damage to their property was caused when the authorities released water from a swollen reservoir to prevent a dam burst. According to the applicants, no emergency warning was given. Further, relying on Art 2, the applicants complained that that the authorities had put their lives at risk by releasing the water without any prior warning and by having failed to maintain the river channel. While the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was prepared to accept that the release of water had been unavoidable given the exceptional weather and the risk of the dam breaking, it was not convinced that the flood could be explained only by adverse weather conditions. Although the authorities were aware of the poor state of a river channel, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll