header-logo header-logo

Rights under pressure

26 April 2012 / Susan Nash
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Susan Nash provides an update on the latest human rights controversies

Relying on Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Art 1 of Protocol No 1 (protection of property), the applicants in Kolyadenko v Russia (App Nos 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05), complained that damage to their property was caused when the authorities released water from a swollen reservoir to prevent a dam burst. According to the applicants, no emergency warning was given. Further, relying on Art 2, the applicants complained that that the authorities had put their lives at risk by releasing the water without any prior warning and by having failed to maintain the river channel. While the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was prepared to accept that the release of water had been unavoidable given the exceptional weather and the risk of the dam breaking, it was not convinced that the flood could be explained only by adverse weather conditions. Although the authorities were aware of the poor state of a river channel, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll