header-logo header-logo

22 June 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The root of the problem

Michael Tringham highlights some misgivings in the recording of vital events to date

When the General Register Office (GRO) decided to digitise 171 years of vital events—the nation’s births, marriages and deaths recorded by generations of local registrars since 1837 and which probate genealogists and family historians alike depend upon—access to the paper records was to have been maintained until the new, improved indexes were available online.

That promise went the way of all flesh in March 2008, when access to the 6,550 physical ledgers kept at the Family Records Centre in north London, was ended, even though the digitisation project was already running a year late. Since then the half finished £16m project has been cancelled with birth records from 1837 to 1934 and death records from 1837 to 1957 still missing. The Identity & Passport Service, which is now responsible for the GRO, say they will “continue to work towards creation of an accessible online index”—but without publishing a timetable.

Meanwhile the GRO shows that it can move quickly enough

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll