header-logo header-logo

22 June 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The root of the problem

Michael Tringham highlights some misgivings in the recording of vital events to date

When the General Register Office (GRO) decided to digitise 171 years of vital events—the nation’s births, marriages and deaths recorded by generations of local registrars since 1837 and which probate genealogists and family historians alike depend upon—access to the paper records was to have been maintained until the new, improved indexes were available online.

That promise went the way of all flesh in March 2008, when access to the 6,550 physical ledgers kept at the Family Records Centre in north London, was ended, even though the digitisation project was already running a year late. Since then the half finished £16m project has been cancelled with birth records from 1837 to 1934 and death records from 1837 to 1957 still missing. The Identity & Passport Service, which is now responsible for the GRO, say they will “continue to work towards creation of an accessible online index”—but without publishing a timetable.

Meanwhile the GRO shows that it can move quickly enough

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll