header-logo header-logo

Running costs

14 July 2016 / Kerry Underwood
Categories: Features , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Kerry Underwood assesses guideline hourly rates

  • The introduction of costs budgeting in virtually all cases except fixed costs matters, and the problems that that has caused the courts, has led to the rates being regarded as “an extremely useful tool” in relation to detailed assessment and budgeting.

Guideline Hourly Rates (GHR) are meant to be just that – “guidelines and not tramlines” and theoretically have no direct application in relation to anything other than summary assessment and are not supposed to replace the experience or knowledge of those familiar with the local area and the field of law generally—see (1) KMT, (2) KAY, (3) Mey, (4) MJY (Children proceeding by their Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor) v Kent County Council [2012] EWHC 2088 QB, [2012] All ER (D) 245 (Jul).

However the introduction of costs budgeting in virtually all cases except fixed costs matters, and the problems that that has caused the courts, has led to the rates being regarded as “an extremely useful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll