header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019 / Simon Davenport KC , Helen Pugh
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Features , Profession , Brexit , ADR
printer mail-detail

Russian litigation in London (Pt 2)

Simon Davenport QC & Helen Pugh consider how the limbo land of Brexit could affect Russian/CIS litigation in London

  • Whether the success of the UK as a forum for Russian/CIS litigation can survive today’s political and more competitive environment.

The past popularity of London as a centre for Russian litigation is undoubtedly being threatened by a number of dark clouds on the horizon. First and foremost is the deteriorating geopolitical environment. While the invasion of Ukraine, the attempted assassination of Sergei Skripal and tragic death of ‘bystander’ Dawn Sturgess on British soil, and election meddling and alleged links to the Trump Presidential campaign all steal the headlines, it is the anti-corruption campaign which is likely to have the greatest impact on Russian nationals and Russian assets in the UK.

The UK Foreign Affairs Committee report entitled ‘Moscow’s Gold: Russian Corruption in the UK’, published on 21 May 2018, concluded frankly that: ‘The use of London as a base for the corrupt assets of Kremlin-connected individuals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll