header-logo header-logo

Safe in-houses?

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Profession

In-house lawyers are bucking the credit crunch with pay awards and may offer a safer route for City lawyers, according to recent research.

A survey conducted by Incomes Data Services found that the average pay increase for in-house lawyers was 6.6% while inflation was at 4.7% for that period. It was reported that the average head of legal salary is now £131,502—an increase of 5.4%. Steve Tatton, editor of the In- House Lawyers Pay Report 2008, says: “We are seeing some of the highest wage inflationary pressure at the bottom of the management hierarchy, suggesting that this is where businesses are finding recruitment and retention most difficult.” He adds that if redundancies at City law firms continue then a career with an in-house team could be a safe bet.

Issue: 7343 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll