header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Safe in-houses?

Profession

In-house lawyers are bucking the credit crunch with pay awards and may offer a safer route for City lawyers, according to recent research.

A survey conducted by Incomes Data Services found that the average pay increase for in-house lawyers was 6.6% while inflation was at 4.7% for that period. It was reported that the average head of legal salary is now £131,502—an increase of 5.4%. Steve Tatton, editor of the In- House Lawyers Pay Report 2008, says: “We are seeing some of the highest wage inflationary pressure at the bottom of the management hierarchy, suggesting that this is where businesses are finding recruitment and retention most difficult.” He adds that if redundancies at City law firms continue then a career with an in-house team could be a safe bet.

Issue: 7343 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll