header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Julie Nazerali , Julie Vandenbussche , Katie Lamb
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The science of risk management

The EC’s Solvency II proposals will change the face of insurance regulation, say Julie Nazerali, Katie Lamb and Julie Vandenbussche

The European Commission’s Solvency II proposal (Comm 2007/361) has finally been issued after years of preparation, analysis and consultation with stakeholders and interested parties.

Since the 1970s, when the EU began developing a legislative framework to facilitate the development of a single market in insurance services and secure an adequate level of consumer protection, the science of risk management has evolved, new products have been launched and new risks have emerged.

The Solvency II proposal aims to meet these new challenges, not by increasing the overall levels of capital requirements—ie how much an insurance firm must put aside to meet any claims that may arise—but rather by ensuring a high standard of risk assessment and efficient capital allocation.

THREE PILLAR APPROACH

The Solvency II approach is based on three pillars which interact with each other.

Pillar I

This defines the financial resources an insurance company needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll