header-logo header-logo

The science of risk management

16 August 2007 / Julie Nazerali , Julie Vandenbussche , Katie Lamb
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The EC’s Solvency II proposals will change the face of insurance regulation, say Julie Nazerali, Katie Lamb and Julie Vandenbussche

The European Commission’s Solvency II proposal (Comm 2007/361) has finally been issued after years of preparation, analysis and consultation with stakeholders and interested parties.

Since the 1970s, when the EU began developing a legislative framework to facilitate the development of a single market in insurance services and secure an adequate level of consumer protection, the science of risk management has evolved, new products have been launched and new risks have emerged.

The Solvency II proposal aims to meet these new challenges, not by increasing the overall levels of capital requirements—ie how much an insurance firm must put aside to meet any claims that may arise—but rather by ensuring a high standard of risk assessment and efficient capital allocation.

THREE PILLAR APPROACH

The Solvency II approach is based on three pillars which interact with each other.

Pillar I

This defines the financial resources an insurance company needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll