header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Julie Nazerali , Julie Vandenbussche , Katie Lamb
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The science of risk management

The EC’s Solvency II proposals will change the face of insurance regulation, say Julie Nazerali, Katie Lamb and Julie Vandenbussche

The European Commission’s Solvency II proposal (Comm 2007/361) has finally been issued after years of preparation, analysis and consultation with stakeholders and interested parties.

Since the 1970s, when the EU began developing a legislative framework to facilitate the development of a single market in insurance services and secure an adequate level of consumer protection, the science of risk management has evolved, new products have been launched and new risks have emerged.

The Solvency II proposal aims to meet these new challenges, not by increasing the overall levels of capital requirements—ie how much an insurance firm must put aside to meet any claims that may arise—but rather by ensuring a high standard of risk assessment and efficient capital allocation.

THREE PILLAR APPROACH

The Solvency II approach is based on three pillars which interact with each other.

Pillar I

This defines the financial resources an insurance company needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll