header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Julie Nazerali , Julie Vandenbussche , Katie Lamb
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The science of risk management

The EC’s Solvency II proposals will change the face of insurance regulation, say Julie Nazerali, Katie Lamb and Julie Vandenbussche

The European Commission’s Solvency II proposal (Comm 2007/361) has finally been issued after years of preparation, analysis and consultation with stakeholders and interested parties.

Since the 1970s, when the EU began developing a legislative framework to facilitate the development of a single market in insurance services and secure an adequate level of consumer protection, the science of risk management has evolved, new products have been launched and new risks have emerged.

The Solvency II proposal aims to meet these new challenges, not by increasing the overall levels of capital requirements—ie how much an insurance firm must put aside to meet any claims that may arise—but rather by ensuring a high standard of risk assessment and efficient capital allocation.

THREE PILLAR APPROACH

The Solvency II approach is based on three pillars which interact with each other.

Pillar I

This defines the financial resources an insurance company needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll