header-logo header-logo

22 April 2010 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Secret agents

Charles Pigott predicts more uncertainty for agency workers

In order to be protected by the employment-related discrimination legislation, it is normally necessary to be in a contractual relationship with the proposed respondent. The conventional view has been that the contract worker provisions that are present in all the major anti-discrimination legislation create an exception from this rule for agency workers. Contract work is defined (for example in s 7(1) Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)) as: “any work for a person (the principal) which is available for doing by individuals (contract workers) who are not employed by the principal himself but by another person, who supplies them under a contract made with the principal.”

Where agency workers are involved, the principal will be the person to whom their labour is supplied and the employment agency will be the “other person” who supplies them. The contract worker provisions then go on to provide for a principal to be liable for acts of discrimination against contract workers, in much the same way as if it had entered into

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll