header-logo header-logo

05 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sentence

 R v Ali [2014] EWCA Crim 1658, [2014] All ER (D) 30 (Aug)

The defendant appealed against a confiscation order against him in the sum of £1,438,180.59 for failing to comply with an enforcement notice for converting a house into 12 flats. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in allowing the appeal held that any rents or proceeds derived from tenants in such properties prior to the expiry of any enforcement notice period could not, in law, constitute relevant proceeds of criminal conduct for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Accordingly, the confiscation order would be substituted by one in the total sum of £544,358.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll