header-logo header-logo

Separating couples discouraged from court as new FPR era begins

29 April 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers will need to continually assess non-court options for clients from this week, after major changes to the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) took effect

The FPR changes encourage parties, lawyers and courts to trial non-court dispute resolutions (NCDR) where possible. Judges will have powers to adjourn proceedings so parties can explore alternative dispute options and can sanction parties who refuse to explore alternative options without a valid reason.

Valid reasons under the FPR include domestic abuse. Non-court options include mediation, arbitration, collaborative law and evaluation by a neutral third party.

Welcoming the FPR changes, Rachel Fisher, partner at Stowe Family Law, said: ‘It is hoped it will continue the considerable cultural shift in the divorce space when the new rules are implemented from 29 April 2024, and reduce pressure on overwhelmed family courts. 

‘It has long been acknowledged that lengthy court battles are expensive, time-consuming, and damaging to all involved.  And thankfully, we are seeing a shift away from the court room. Here at Stowe, the number of financial divorce settlements going to court has fallen by 11% since 2018, but there is still some way to go. 

‘The introduction of no-fault divorce in April 2022 has certainly helped, making, in many cases, divorce less adversarial from the off, and helping pave the way for a more amicable resolve.’

However, Fisher added ‘a word of caution: tools such as mediation are rarely appropriate for cases involving domestic abuse, and it is vital that survivors are not forced into inappropriate and unsafe processes to conclude their divorce cases’.

Evie Smyth, associate in the family law team at Russell-Cooke LLP, said: ‘It remains to be seen to what extent the forthcoming changes to the FPR will herald a change in the uptake of NCDR and how readily the courts will employ the new rules where parties fail to engage in NCDR processes.

‘What is clear is that there has never been a more pressing need for NCDR, at a time when family courts are facing a huge backlog of cases and families are waiting longer and longer for a hearing date. It is hoped that the new rules will guide many families who may have otherwise used the courts by default, to properly consider less adversarial and more efficient ways of resolving their disputes.’

Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Gustina Singgih

Charles Russell Speechlys—Gustina Singgih

Corporate team in London welcomes new partner

Church Court Chambers—Maria Karaiskos KC

Church Court Chambers—Maria Karaiskos KC

Historic appointment of chambers' first female head

Wright Hassall—five promotions

Wright Hassall—five promotions

Firm announces five promotions, including new partner

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll