header-logo header-logo

Separating couples discouraged from court as new FPR era begins

29 April 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers will need to continually assess non-court options for clients from this week, after major changes to the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) took effect

The FPR changes encourage parties, lawyers and courts to trial non-court dispute resolutions (NCDR) where possible. Judges will have powers to adjourn proceedings so parties can explore alternative dispute options and can sanction parties who refuse to explore alternative options without a valid reason.

Valid reasons under the FPR include domestic abuse. Non-court options include mediation, arbitration, collaborative law and evaluation by a neutral third party.

Welcoming the FPR changes, Rachel Fisher, partner at Stowe Family Law, said: ‘It is hoped it will continue the considerable cultural shift in the divorce space when the new rules are implemented from 29 April 2024, and reduce pressure on overwhelmed family courts. 

‘It has long been acknowledged that lengthy court battles are expensive, time-consuming, and damaging to all involved.  And thankfully, we are seeing a shift away from the court room. Here at Stowe, the number of financial divorce settlements going to court has fallen by 11% since 2018, but there is still some way to go. 

‘The introduction of no-fault divorce in April 2022 has certainly helped, making, in many cases, divorce less adversarial from the off, and helping pave the way for a more amicable resolve.’

However, Fisher added ‘a word of caution: tools such as mediation are rarely appropriate for cases involving domestic abuse, and it is vital that survivors are not forced into inappropriate and unsafe processes to conclude their divorce cases’.

Evie Smyth, associate in the family law team at Russell-Cooke LLP, said: ‘It remains to be seen to what extent the forthcoming changes to the FPR will herald a change in the uptake of NCDR and how readily the courts will employ the new rules where parties fail to engage in NCDR processes.

‘What is clear is that there has never been a more pressing need for NCDR, at a time when family courts are facing a huge backlog of cases and families are waiting longer and longer for a hearing date. It is hoped that the new rules will guide many families who may have otherwise used the courts by default, to properly consider less adversarial and more efficient ways of resolving their disputes.’

Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll