header-logo header-logo

Serve claim…wait 456 days for next move

03 June 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail
Research into fast-track and multi-track civil claims has revealed a patchwork of bottlenecks and delays across England and Wales

The joint study of 8,500 cases (not including small claims) by Express Solicitors and the Association of Consumer Support Organisations (ACSO), Civil court delays, published last week, exposed ‘significant regional differences’. The East of England was the worst overall performer, with an average 350 days between service of claim form and completion of first costs and case management conference (CCMC). Next was the South East, followed by the North East.

Delays varied according to size of claim, for example, Thanet County Court was taking more than 456 days for CCMCs for some claims, Chelmsford 426 days, Reading 424, Bournemouth 394 and Durham 377.

The best-performing regions were Yorkshire and the Humber, with an average wait time of 210 days, followed by West Midlands (235 days) and the North West (236 days).

Overall, people were kept waiting more than nine months for their CCMC in six out of ten regions. These figures do not include instances where further CCMCs are required, which would create more delay.

James Maxey, managing partner of Express Solicitors, said: ‘The government’s quarterly figures only provide a national picture so we have done our own research on regional variations, and the outcome is shocking.

‘It beggars belief that a client should wait for over a year or more for their case to be heard in Chelmsford, Reading or Durham. The figures underline what a postcode lottery civil justice has become.

‘During this year, courts have cancelled 20 trials where we are representing clients at the very last minute because there have been no available judges. The cost is significant; clients have often travelled miles to court (and taken a day off work) only to be told that there is no judge.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
back-to-top-scroll