header-logo header-logo

Serve claim…wait 456 days for next move

03 June 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail
Research into fast-track and multi-track civil claims has revealed a patchwork of bottlenecks and delays across England and Wales

The joint study of 8,500 cases (not including small claims) by Express Solicitors and the Association of Consumer Support Organisations (ACSO), Civil court delays, published last week, exposed ‘significant regional differences’. The East of England was the worst overall performer, with an average 350 days between service of claim form and completion of first costs and case management conference (CCMC). Next was the South East, followed by the North East.

Delays varied according to size of claim, for example, Thanet County Court was taking more than 456 days for CCMCs for some claims, Chelmsford 426 days, Reading 424, Bournemouth 394 and Durham 377.

The best-performing regions were Yorkshire and the Humber, with an average wait time of 210 days, followed by West Midlands (235 days) and the North West (236 days).

Overall, people were kept waiting more than nine months for their CCMC in six out of ten regions. These figures do not include instances where further CCMCs are required, which would create more delay.

James Maxey, managing partner of Express Solicitors, said: ‘The government’s quarterly figures only provide a national picture so we have done our own research on regional variations, and the outcome is shocking.

‘It beggars belief that a client should wait for over a year or more for their case to be heard in Chelmsford, Reading or Durham. The figures underline what a postcode lottery civil justice has become.

‘During this year, courts have cancelled 20 trials where we are representing clients at the very last minute because there have been no available judges. The cost is significant; clients have often travelled miles to court (and taken a day off work) only to be told that there is no judge.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll