header-logo header-logo

Serve claim…wait 456 days for next move

03 June 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail
Research into fast-track and multi-track civil claims has revealed a patchwork of bottlenecks and delays across England and Wales

The joint study of 8,500 cases (not including small claims) by Express Solicitors and the Association of Consumer Support Organisations (ACSO), Civil court delays, published last week, exposed ‘significant regional differences’. The East of England was the worst overall performer, with an average 350 days between service of claim form and completion of first costs and case management conference (CCMC). Next was the South East, followed by the North East.

Delays varied according to size of claim, for example, Thanet County Court was taking more than 456 days for CCMCs for some claims, Chelmsford 426 days, Reading 424, Bournemouth 394 and Durham 377.

The best-performing regions were Yorkshire and the Humber, with an average wait time of 210 days, followed by West Midlands (235 days) and the North West (236 days).

Overall, people were kept waiting more than nine months for their CCMC in six out of ten regions. These figures do not include instances where further CCMCs are required, which would create more delay.

James Maxey, managing partner of Express Solicitors, said: ‘The government’s quarterly figures only provide a national picture so we have done our own research on regional variations, and the outcome is shocking.

‘It beggars belief that a client should wait for over a year or more for their case to be heard in Chelmsford, Reading or Durham. The figures underline what a postcode lottery civil justice has become.

‘During this year, courts have cancelled 20 trials where we are representing clients at the very last minute because there have been no available judges. The cost is significant; clients have often travelled miles to court (and taken a day off work) only to be told that there is no judge.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll