header-logo header-logo

Serve claim…wait 456 days for next move

03 June 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail
Research into fast-track and multi-track civil claims has revealed a patchwork of bottlenecks and delays across England and Wales

The joint study of 8,500 cases (not including small claims) by Express Solicitors and the Association of Consumer Support Organisations (ACSO), Civil court delays, published last week, exposed ‘significant regional differences’. The East of England was the worst overall performer, with an average 350 days between service of claim form and completion of first costs and case management conference (CCMC). Next was the South East, followed by the North East.

Delays varied according to size of claim, for example, Thanet County Court was taking more than 456 days for CCMCs for some claims, Chelmsford 426 days, Reading 424, Bournemouth 394 and Durham 377.

The best-performing regions were Yorkshire and the Humber, with an average wait time of 210 days, followed by West Midlands (235 days) and the North West (236 days).

Overall, people were kept waiting more than nine months for their CCMC in six out of ten regions. These figures do not include instances where further CCMCs are required, which would create more delay.

James Maxey, managing partner of Express Solicitors, said: ‘The government’s quarterly figures only provide a national picture so we have done our own research on regional variations, and the outcome is shocking.

‘It beggars belief that a client should wait for over a year or more for their case to be heard in Chelmsford, Reading or Durham. The figures underline what a postcode lottery civil justice has become.

‘During this year, courts have cancelled 20 trials where we are representing clients at the very last minute because there have been no available judges. The cost is significant; clients have often travelled miles to court (and taken a day off work) only to be told that there is no judge.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll