header-logo header-logo

Settled or not?

05 March 2020
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
16963
District Judge Corkill advocates the need to choose the correct method of settlement
  • Notices of discontinuance: filing, serving and specifying.
  • Consent orders: agreed terms and enforcement.
  • Tomlin orders: applications and common errors.

‘Dear Judge…this claim has settled please vacate the hearing…’. Such letters are frequently seen in our box work from solicitors particularly on claims allocated to the small claims track. Is such a letter sufficient to conclude a claim? On reading the CPR this is not one of the methods by which a claim can be concluded.

Whether a claim is allocated to the small, fast or multi-track, when a settlement has been negotiated the parties should consider which of the methods prescribed by the CPR to use. The following is a summary of the most common methods used but before choosing one of them do familiarise yourself with the relevant rule, requirements and consequences.

To be effective, the notice must be filed, served on every party, if there is more than one defendant it must specify against which of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll