header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sex, lies & videotape

personal_injury_4

Richard Scorer investigates the world of undercover police work

It has been revealed that undercover police officers infiltrated anarchist and environmental groups and tried to use sexual relationships with female activists as a means of garnering intelligence. Mark Kennedy, an undercover officer who had sexual relationships with several women while infiltrating a ring of activists, alleges that these relationships were sanctioned by senior commanders in the Metropolitan Police. While his claims of official authorisation are disputed, it seems clear that a number of undercover agents engaged in a deliberate “strategy of promiscuity”. The affected women have expressed feelings of anger and trauma. Could they bring damages claims against the Metropolitan Police?

Provided sex occurs between consenting adults, the fact that one party to the relationship has lied to the other is obviously not actionable in itself. A sexual encounter which is consensual at the time it occurred would not become “rape” simply because one party pretended to be motivated by love. However, in this situation the state is involved in perpetrating the deceit,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll