header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 March 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sex, lies & videotape

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
personal_injury_4

Richard Scorer investigates the world of undercover police work

It has been revealed that undercover police officers infiltrated anarchist and environmental groups and tried to use sexual relationships with female activists as a means of garnering intelligence. Mark Kennedy, an undercover officer who had sexual relationships with several women while infiltrating a ring of activists, alleges that these relationships were sanctioned by senior commanders in the Metropolitan Police. While his claims of official authorisation are disputed, it seems clear that a number of undercover agents engaged in a deliberate “strategy of promiscuity”. The affected women have expressed feelings of anger and trauma. Could they bring damages claims against the Metropolitan Police?

Provided sex occurs between consenting adults, the fact that one party to the relationship has lied to the other is obviously not actionable in itself. A sexual encounter which is consensual at the time it occurred would not become “rape” simply because one party pretended to be motivated by love. However, in this situation the state is involved in perpetrating the deceit,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll