header-logo header-logo

Sex matters with in-house counsel

29 January 2015
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Male and female general counsel approach the purchase of legal services in different ways, research has shown.

A survey of more than 2,000 general counsel by legal market research provider Acritas suggests that the cultural barriers that often prevent women rising through the ranks in private practice may also hinder men’s ability to win more work from female general counsel.

For example, men were more influenced by “trustworthiness and reliability”, and “experience and track record”, while women preferred “understanding of my business” and “knowledge of how I work”. One female general counsel in a large technology company said of her preferred firm: “They understand the peculiarities of our very narrow market niche. So for instance I get more focused and practical advice from them and I have to do a lot less explaining and a lot less re-writing.”

Women valued effective, prompt communications more highly than men did, particularly “checking in” to make sure the work was going well.

Issue: 7638 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll