header-logo header-logo

06 May 2020 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Shadow forensic experts

20155
Rakesh Kapila considers how forensic accountants can play a very useful role as shadow experts in many types of case
  • Benefits of instructing shadow experts.
  • Examples of work undertaken by forensic accountants as shadow experts.

A ‘shadow expert’ advises one of the parties in a case as part of the legal team and is not approved or endorsed by the court. Forensic accountants can play a very useful role as shadow experts in many types of case, including commercial disputes, matrimonial cases, personal injury claims and employment disputes.

Solicitors may wish to instruct shadow experts for a number of reasons. For instance, they may want assistance on specific matters outside their expertise, they may be seeking ongoing advice on accounting and financial matters throughout legal proceedings or they may want to obtain ‘second’ opinions on reports prepared by single joint experts. This article highlights the benefits of instructing forensic accountants as shadow experts, sets out the key features of the types of case on which they may be instructed as shadow experts and provides

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll