header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Off side or won goal?

was King Kev wise to walk out on Newcastle United? Chris Syder reports

Anyone with an interest in football will have been fascinated about the recent high-profile employment conflict between Kevin Keegan and Dennis Wise, which it is claimed was at the heart of late-night discussions at Newcastle United to convince Keegan not to walk out on his employment.

With the assistance of the League Managers Association, Keegan retracted his apparent earlier resignation and engaged in talks “with a list of demands”. It is understood that Keegan’s priority was control of future transfers at St James’s Park, as he felt his role as manager was being undermined. The “him or me” power battle that followed between Keegan on one side and Wise and Tony Jimenez, Newcastle’s vice-president overseeing recruitment, and the directors, on the other side (who vet all transfers) over Newcastle United’s transfer policy is being asserted as one of the main causes for Keegan’s subsequent final resignation. 

It is not yet clear whether Keegan had second thoughts about leaving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll