header-logo header-logo

Signs of retreat

02 June 2011 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Public , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Is the government backtracking on equality duties, asks Charles Pigott

IN BRIEF

  • The latest version of the “quick start” guide to the public sector equality duty has been issued, six weeks after the government’s policy review paper.
  • They signal that the specific duties imposed on public sector bodies in England under the Equality Act 2010 will be less onerous than under previous legislation.

One of the most significant changes introduced by the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) was the introduction of a public sector equality duty which embraced not only the three strands where such a duty already applied (race, sex and disability) but five additional protected characteristics: age, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, religion or belief, and sexual orientation. The duty is set out in s 149 of EqA 2010 and came into effect on 5 April 2011.

Section 149 spells out the matters to which a public authority must have “due regard” in the exercise of its functions, and also makes it clear that the same duty applies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll