header-logo header-logo

Silence is golden

30 June 2023 / Mary Young
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Features , Disclosure , Fraud , In Court
printer mail-detail
128483
Holding your tongue? Mary Young considers when a party’s right to silence applies in civil proceedings
  • How and when the privilege against self-incrimination (the right to silence) applies in civil proceedings.

In English criminal law, a suspect has a long-recognised right to remain silent. The police caution specifically reminds a suspect that they do not have to say anything, but that it might harm their defence if they do not mention something which they later rely on in court.

In civil claims with criminal or quasi-criminal implications, the right to remain silent can also apply: a defendant has the right not to give evidence, and is also entitled to assert the privilege against self-incrimination to avoid circumstances in which they are compelled to contribute to their own prosecution.

The principle of the privilege against self-incrimination originated from the common law, later codified in s 14 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968. This sets out that in proceedings other than criminal proceedings, a person has the right to refuse to answer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll