header-logo header-logo

Silence is golden

30 June 2023 / Mary Young
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Features , Disclosure , Fraud , In Court
printer mail-detail
128483
Holding your tongue? Mary Young considers when a party’s right to silence applies in civil proceedings
  • How and when the privilege against self-incrimination (the right to silence) applies in civil proceedings.

In English criminal law, a suspect has a long-recognised right to remain silent. The police caution specifically reminds a suspect that they do not have to say anything, but that it might harm their defence if they do not mention something which they later rely on in court.

In civil claims with criminal or quasi-criminal implications, the right to remain silent can also apply: a defendant has the right not to give evidence, and is also entitled to assert the privilege against self-incrimination to avoid circumstances in which they are compelled to contribute to their own prosecution.

The principle of the privilege against self-incrimination originated from the common law, later codified in s 14 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968. This sets out that in proceedings other than criminal proceedings, a person has the right to refuse to answer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll