header-logo header-logo

Silence is golden

30 June 2023 / Mary Young
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Features , Disclosure , Fraud , In Court
printer mail-detail
128483
Holding your tongue? Mary Young considers when a party’s right to silence applies in civil proceedings
  • How and when the privilege against self-incrimination (the right to silence) applies in civil proceedings.

In English criminal law, a suspect has a long-recognised right to remain silent. The police caution specifically reminds a suspect that they do not have to say anything, but that it might harm their defence if they do not mention something which they later rely on in court.

In civil claims with criminal or quasi-criminal implications, the right to remain silent can also apply: a defendant has the right not to give evidence, and is also entitled to assert the privilege against self-incrimination to avoid circumstances in which they are compelled to contribute to their own prosecution.

The principle of the privilege against self-incrimination originated from the common law, later codified in s 14 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968. This sets out that in proceedings other than criminal proceedings, a person has the right to refuse to answer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll