header-logo header-logo

17 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Sliding scale on whiplash?

A leading insurer has suggested a sliding scale for whiplash injuries.

In a speech at the recent Association of British Insurers conference last week, Andy Watson, chief executive of Ageas UK, called for greater collaboration between all the groups involved in the insurance process, from brokers to lawyers. One way to reduce conflict during the claims process, he suggested, was to introduce a sliding scale for whiplash claims depending on when the claim was made. Claimants who brought their claim near to the end of the three-year limitation period would therefore receive less. This would encourage claimants to bring their case at an earlier stage when the facts are more easily determined.

However, personal injury lawyers found the comments “worrying”. Jonathan Leach, solicitor and director at Watson Rambottom, for example, pointed out that the three-year deadline is already half that of negligence cases not based on personal injury.

Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll